THE Sustainability Impact Ratings and QS Sustainability Rankings: How Indian Universities Compete

Sustainability rankings are won on evidence — policies, initiatives, measured outcomes and research mapped to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. India is among the most represented countries in both, and the evidence load is the reason most institutions under-perform. This guide covers both methodologies and how to build the evidence once.

📋 Book a sustainability evidence review Compare the methodologies
2ndIndia by number of universities, THE 2026
103Indian universities, QS Sustainability 2026
5%Sustainability weight in QS World Rankings

Updated October 2026 · Prepared by Edhitch’s rankings advisory team

What are the sustainability rankings for universities?

The two that matter for Indian universities are THE’s Sustainability Impact Ratings — the 2026 relaunch of the THE Impact Rankings, built on the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals — and the QS Sustainability Rankings, which score environmental impact, social impact and governance. The QS score also counts for 5% of the QS World University Rankings.

THE Sustainability Impact Ratings (formerly THE Impact Rankings)

For 2026, THE relaunched the Impact Rankings as the Sustainability Impact Ratings. The methodology is unchanged; data submission is now open to members of THE’s Sustainability Impact Network.

ElementHow it works
Scope17 tables, one per SDG, plus an overall table
Overall scoreSDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) at 22%, plus the institution’s best three other SDGs at 26% each
Four pillarsResearch, stewardship, outreach and teaching
MeasuresResearch metrics from publication data; continuous metrics usually normalised by size; policy and initiative metrics backed by evidence, with credit for public evidence
Missing dataScored as zero
EligibilityAny university teaching at undergraduate or postgraduate level — no research threshold

2026 results: 1,646 universities from 116 countries, published 23 June 2026. India was the second most represented country with 110 ranked universities. Lovely Professional University (joint 23rd), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (joint 37th) and JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research (joint 74th) led India.

QS Sustainability Rankings

Category (weight)Lenses and weights
Environmental Impact (45%)Environmental Education 17% · Environmental Research 13% · Environmental Sustainability 15%
Social Impact (45%)Employability and Opportunities 11% · Equality 12% · Health and Wellbeing 5% · Impact of Education 7% · Knowledge Exchange 10%
Governance (10%)Good Governance 10%

2026 edition: released 18 November 2025, ranking more than 2,000 universities. India had 103 ranked universities — fourth by count after the US, China and the UK — with IIT Delhi first in India at 205. Institutions submit data through QS HUB; QS supplements it with its own reputation surveys and public data. Universities eligible for QS’s world, regional or subject rankings are assessed automatically.

One evidence base, four frameworks

EvidenceTHE Sustainability ImpactQS SustainabilityNAACNIRF
Environmental policies and practicesSDGs 6, 7, 12, 13Environmental SustainabilityCriterion 7—
Inclusion and equality dataSDGs 4, 5, 10EqualityCriterion 5OI
Sustainability researchResearch pillarEnvironmental ResearchCriterion 3RP
Outreach and community workOutreach pillarKnowledge ExchangeCriterion 3 (extension)—
Governance and ethics policiesSDG 16Good GovernanceCriterion 6—

Where Indian universities lose marks

  • Policies that exist but cannot be shown. Evidence is in committee files, not in public documents the rankers can verify.
  • Missing data scored as zero. In THE, a metric left blank scores nothing — and many are left blank for lack of a record.
  • The wrong SDGs. Institutions submit the goals they care about, not the three where their evidence is strongest.
  • Rebuilt every year. Evidence is gathered from scratch each cycle instead of maintained.
  • Disconnected from NAAC. Criterion 7 evidence and SDG evidence describe the same work, collected twice.

Master Data Map’s sustainability module

Master Data Map keeps sustainability evidence the way it keeps accreditation evidence — continuously, mapped to every framework that asks for it, on the same record that produces your NAAC, NIRF, THE and QS data.

CapabilityWhat it does
SDG evidence vaultEvery policy, initiative and outcome tagged to the SDG metrics it serves, with public-evidence links ready for THE.
SDG selection modellingScores your evidence across all 17 SDGs and shows which three, with SDG 17, give the strongest overall result.
Gap finderLists every THE metric and QS lens with missing evidence — before a blank becomes a zero.
QS Sustainability dataPrepares QS HUB data for the environmental, social and governance lenses from the institutional record.
NAAC Criterion 7 linkReuses the same evidence for NAAC environment, inclusion and best-practice metrics.

Turn sustainability work into ranking evidence

See your SDG evidence mapped to THE and QS on one record — and which goals to submit.

🎥 See Master Data Map Book a sustainability evidence review

Frequently asked questions

What happened to the THE Impact Rankings?

For 2026, THE relaunched the Impact Rankings as the Sustainability Impact Ratings. The methodology is unchanged, and data submission is open to members of THE’s Sustainability Impact Network.

How is the THE Sustainability Impact overall score calculated?

SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) counts for 22%, and the institution’s best three other SDGs count for 26% each. Each SDG is assessed across research, stewardship, outreach and teaching.

How did India perform in THE’s 2026 sustainability ratings?

India was the second most represented country with 110 ranked universities. Lovely Professional University, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham and JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research led India.

What is the QS Sustainability Rankings methodology?

Environmental Impact (45%), Social Impact (45%) and Governance (10%), made up of lenses such as Environmental Education, Environmental Research, Equality, Knowledge Exchange and Good Governance.

Does sustainability affect the QS World University Rankings?

Yes. Sustainability is a 5% lens in the QS World University Rankings, drawn from the QS Sustainability Rankings.

How does Master Data Map help with sustainability rankings?

Master Data Map keeps an SDG evidence vault, models which SDGs give the strongest THE result, finds missing evidence before submission, prepares QS Sustainability data, and reuses the same evidence for NAAC Criterion 7.

About this guide

Prepared by Edhitch’s rankings advisory team from THE’s Sustainability Impact Ratings methodology and the QS Sustainability Rankings methodology. Edhitch has 12+ years of experience in Indian higher education and has trained 9,000+ faculty and leaders. Last reviewed: October 2026.

Sustainability Evidence Review

30-minute session with our rankings team. We’ll map your sustainability evidence to THE and QS and show which SDGs to submit.

📋   Sustainability Rankings Enquiry

Questions? WhatsApp +91-92051 19385  ·  Email info@edhitch.com

✓

Enquiry Received!

Our team will respond within 24 hours.
For immediate help: WhatsApp +91-92051 19385

💬