Most institutions enter NAAC, NBA, and NIRF cycles trusting their own data — and discover the gaps only when assessors flag them. Edhitch's diagnostics give you the same view the evaluators will have. Independently. Before submission. While there is still time to fix what matters.
Why commission three separate audits when the same institutional data feeds all three frameworks? One engagement. All three frameworks. Board-ready findings in 4 weeks.
Deep-level review across all three frameworks — same depth as our individual Deep audits, delivered as one integrated engagement.
Need depth on just one framework? See 9 focused single-framework diagnostics below ↓
Our consultants don't start from a blank sheet. Every Edhitch diagnostic is anchored in our proprietary intelligence layer.
What this means for your institution: the data analysis is faster, the benchmarking is real (not anecdotal), and the gaps we surface are validated against patterns from 100+ peer institutions. The judgment is human. The depth is platform-enabled.
Three diagnostics for three stages: readiness, validation, and performance improvement
You're considering NIRF participation — first time or repeat — and want an honest check on whether your data, formulas, and processes are ready before you submit.
You've been submitting but you suspect formula inconsistencies, validation flags, or DVV risks. We find the errors before NIRF finds them for you.
You work harder every cycle. Your rank stays flat or drops. We find the specific parameters where you're leaking marks and why effort isn't converting to movement.
Three diagnostics covering readiness, evidence quality, and deep criterion-level review
You want an honest external check under the revised binary framework — not reassurance from your own team. We review your readiness criterion by criterion.
Your SSR content is ready but you're worried about evidence quality, documentation gaps, and whether your proof chains will hold up under DVV scrutiny.
You're past the quick-check stage. You need a deep, structured audit across every NAAC criterion — evidence quality, metric accuracy, process alignment, DVV readiness.
Three diagnostics for CO-PO accuracy, SAR readiness, and process compliance
Your NBA coordinator has built the matrices and calculations, but nobody has independently verified the logic, the Bloom's alignment, or whether the numbers add up.
You're preparing for an NBA visit and need an independent consistency check across all criteria — logic gaps, missing evidence, criterion-level weaknesses.
Your OBE implementation, faculty engagement, and NBA compliance processes have been running for a while. You want someone external to tell you if they'll actually pass scrutiny.
Find the sentence that sounds like your situation. That's your diagnostic.
| Your situation | Start with | Price |
|---|---|---|
| "We're considering NIRF for the first time" | NIRF Readiness Check | ₹15,000 |
| "We submit NIRF but worry about data errors" | NIRF Data & Validation Audit | ₹25,000 |
| "We're ranked but our rank won't improve" | NIRF Rank Improvement | ₹35,000 |
| "We're preparing for NAAC — are we ready?" | NAAC Readiness Check | ₹15,000 |
| "Will our NAAC evidence survive DVV?" | NAAC Evidence & DVV Audit | ₹25,000 |
| "We need a deep NAAC audit" | NAAC Deep Audit | ₹35,000 |
| "Is our CO-PO mapping correct?" | CO-PO Accuracy Check | ₹15,000 |
| "Is our NBA SAR ready?" | NBA SAR Readiness Check | ₹25,000 |
| "Our NBA processes need a review" | NBA Process Audit | ₹35,000 |
| "I need the full picture across all three" | Integrated Diagnostic | ₹50,000 |
All prices exclusive of 18% GST. Fixed-fee engagements. 50% advance on confirmation, balance on delivery.
Not sure at all? Take our free 5-minute NIRF Readiness Self-Check →
"Your presentation provided valuable clarity on our institute's current NIRF ratings and highlighted key areas for short-term improvement with great precision and practicality. The session has given our team a clearer understanding of performance metrics and actionable steps."
"This is to acknowledge the contribution of Edhitch towards strengthening the ongoing quality initiatives. The workshop provided our faculty members with valuable insights into the evolving NBA framework and the practices essential for continuous improvement. We look forward to continuing our association with Edhitch for future initiatives related to accreditation, quality enhancement, and institutional ranking improvement."
"This programme offered a highly structured and insightful approach to understanding institutional performance through the integrated perspectives of NAAC, NBA, and NIRF. The Edhitch platform demonstration was especially impressive in showcasing how technology can simplify accreditation and performance management processes."
"One of the most valuable takeaways was the realization that institutions often lose scores in NBA, NAAC, and NIRF not due to a lack of data, but because information remains fragmented across multiple systems, formats, and reporting mechanisms. The sessions strongly emphasized integrated data management and evidence-based reporting."
"An eye opener and a practical experience regarding NBA, NAAC, and NIRF accreditation processes. The resource persons beautifully explained the significance of strategic planning, documentation, and reporting for obtaining higher scores. Highly practical, informative, and effectively delivered."
Select your diagnostic(s), fill in your details. We'll respond within 24 hours.