Quick navigation
What changed in NBA accreditation in 2025
Three structural changes matter most. Together they reflect a shift toward data-driven evidence and tighter integration with national academic records.
The three core 2025 changes
SAR New Format (July 2024 document)
The Self-Assessment Report format was overhauled for Tier-I Engineering, applicable from 1 August 2024 and mandatory from 1 January 2025. The new format requires more specific evidence on Complex Engineering Problems (WP) and Complex Engineering Activities (EA). Tier-II had a transition window through June 2025; the new format is now the only option there too.
GAPC v4.0 — Washington Accord 2021 Alignment
The General Assessment Process & Criteria (GAPC) advanced to v4.0, reflecting the Washington Accord 2021 review. Program Outcomes reduced from 12 to 11. Sustainability and Ethics are no longer standalone POs; they are integrated into Design, Investigation, and Analysis. Curriculum and assessment must reflect this structural shift. Note: per NBA, Washington Accord recognition in India applies only to UG Engineering programmes of Tier-I institutions.
Strict Data Integration (ONOD)
NBA now operates under the broader One Nation One Data Platform discipline. Data submitted in SAR is cross-verified against AICTE-approved intake records, university examination data, NIRF submissions, and AISHE filings. Zero tolerance for discrepancies between these systems — a common cause of pre-qualifier rejection.
NBA Manual Index — All current documents
Direct links to the official NBA portal at nbaind.org. Bookmark this page — we keep document references current as NBA updates manuals.
Tier-I Engineering (Autonomous Institutions)
Applicable to autonomous engineering institutions where the institution designs its own curriculum and one batch has graduated under autonomy. Mandatory SAR format: July 2024 document.
| Document | Current Version | Source & Status |
|---|---|---|
| SAR Format for Tier-I Engineering | July 2024 Current | View on NBA portal · Mandatory from 1 January 2025 |
| Pre-Qualifier (Tier-I UG Engineering) | Current | View on NBA portal · Required before SAR submission |
| Evaluation Guidelines (Tier-I) | August 2024 | View on NBA portal · Used by evaluators during visit |
| Annexure I — Knowledge & Attitude Profile (WK) | Current | View on NBA portal · Reference for graduate attributes |
| Annexures II–XI (supporting templates) | Current | View on NBA portal · Various forms & templates |
Tier-II Engineering (Affiliated Institutions)
Applicable to affiliated engineering institutions where the university designs the curriculum and awards the degree. New format effective January 2025; transition window ended June 2025.
| Document | Current Version | Source & Status |
|---|---|---|
| SAR Format for Tier-II Engineering | Current (2025) Current | View Tier-II Manual PDF (NBA) |
| Pre-Qualifier (Tier-II UG Engineering) | Current | View on NBA portal |
| Evaluation Guidelines (Tier-II) | Current | View on NBA portal |
Other Programme Categories
NBA accredits beyond engineering. Each programme category has its own manual with category-specific evaluation criteria.
| Programme Category | Framework | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PG Engineering | Separate SAR & criteria for PG | NBA portal |
| Diploma Engineering | Diploma-specific evaluation | NBA portal |
| Pharmacy (D.Pharm / B.Pharm / M.Pharm) | Aligned with PCI | NBA portal |
| Architecture | Studio-based assessment | NBA portal |
| MCA | MCA-specific outcome structure | NBA portal |
| Management (MBA, PGDM) | Three Gates framework (Faculty, Industry, Alumni) — 400 marks | NBA portal |
| Hotel Management | Discipline-specific framework | NBA portal |
Which NBA manual applies to your institution?
Step through the questions below to identify the correct manual for your accreditation submission.
Decision tree
Most institutional questions resolve in two or three steps.
Is this an Engineering programme or a non-Engineering programme?
If Engineering UG (B.Tech / B.E.), continue to Step 2.
If Engineering PG (M.Tech / M.E.), use the PG Engineering manual.
If Diploma Engineering, use the Diploma manual.
If Management (MBA, PGDM), use the Management manual with Three Gates framework.
If Pharmacy, Architecture, MCA, or Hotel Management, use the discipline-specific manual.
Has the institution been granted Autonomous status by UGC, with at least one batch graduated under autonomy?
If yes (autonomous, one batch graduated): use the Tier-I UG Engineering Manual.
If no (affiliated to a university for degree-awarding purposes): use the Tier-II UG Engineering Manual.
Note: Newly autonomous institutions must wait until the first cohort under autonomy graduates before applying under Tier-I.
Has the programme had enough batches graduate?
NBA accredits programmes from which at least two batches of students have graduated — except Management programmes, which require at least three batches graduated (per NBA's official FAQ). Programmes that have not met this threshold are not yet eligible for accreditation.
For Tier-I Engineering: which SAR format should we use?
From 1 January 2025, only the July 2024 SAR document is available for Tier-I Engineering programmes. The January 2016 document is no longer accepted.
For Tier-II Engineering: the new format has been effective since January 2025; the transition window allowing the previous format ended in June 2025.
The NBA Pre-Qualifier — what it is and how to clear it
Introduced to screen applications before full SAR evaluation. Most pre-qualifier rejections trace to a small number of recurring causes.
How the Pre-Qualifier works
Six steps from application to accreditation decision under the current process.
Apply on the eNBA portal
Eligible institutions apply through the eNBA portal at nbaind.org for the specific programme(s) being submitted. Eligibility requires at least two batches have graduated for the programme (Engineering, Pharmacy, Architecture, etc.), or three batches for Management programmes.
Pay 10% fee, submit Pre-Qualifier format
Institution pays 10% of the application fee and submits the Pre-Qualifier format. The Pre-Qualifier captures essential metrics: AICTE-approved intake, faculty headcount, SFR, Faculty Cadre Ratio, establishment details, infrastructure compliance.
NBA evaluates Pre-Qualifier
NBA evaluates the Pre-Qualifier against essential thresholds. Compliant programmes proceed to Step 4. Non-compliant programmes are informed of shortcomings; institutions may re-apply after correction.
Pay remaining 90%, submit full SAR
On Pre-Qualifier approval, the institution pays the remaining 90% of the fee and submits the full Self-Assessment Report (SAR) in the current format (July 2024 document for Tier-I Engineering as of 2025).
Institutional visit and evaluation
NBA assigns an evaluation team. The team conducts an institutional visit, evaluates evidence against the SAR, and submits a draft analysis to the institution for factual response (within 14 days).
Moderation and final decision
After the institution's factual response, the Moderation Committee submits the comprehensive report to the Evaluation and Accreditation Committee (EAC) and the Academic Advisory Committee, which makes the final accreditation decision.
Where institutions actually fail — the recurring compliance gaps
Drawn from 12 years of Edhitch advisory work with engineering, pharmacy, and management institutions. These are the gaps that cause pre-qualifier rejections and adverse observations in peer team visits.
The six recurring failure modes
1. Establishment-AICTE mismatch
Establishment details declared in SAR must match AICTE records exactly: institution name, address, year of establishment, sanctioned intake. Even small discrepancies (a comma in the address, a year-off founding date) flag as data integrity failures under ONOD. Fix: pull AICTE records before drafting SAR and conform to the canonical version.
2. SFR inflation / faculty count discrepancies
SFR is computed against regular faculty as on the cut-off date, with required qualifications. Counting visiting faculty, faculty on long leave, or unqualified instructors inflates SFR and is caught at verification. NBA also cross-checks declared headcount against AISHE. Fix: maintain a single source of truth for faculty register that all three frameworks (NBA, NAAC, NIRF) pull from.
3. CO-PO attainment without 3-year CQI evidence
The new format expects 3 years of PO/PSO attainment data with documented changes: which courses were revised, which assessment patterns updated, what pedagogy shifted based on attainment data. Producing CO-PO numbers without evidence of resulting actions is the single most common adverse observation in peer team visits.
4. Complex Engineering Problems — weak evidence
GAPC v4.0 sharpens the evidence bar for Complex Engineering Problems (WP) and Complex Engineering Activities (EA). Many institutions list project titles without demonstrating how each maps to the complex problem attributes (depth of knowledge, range of conflicting requirements, etc.). Fix: tag each major project explicitly against the WP attributes.
5. Faculty Cadre Ratio
The Cadre Ratio (Professor : Associate Professor : Assistant Professor) is a strict pre-qualifier metric. Heavy reliance on Assistant Professors with few or no Professors triggers immediate observations. Recruitment patterns reflect institutional priorities; the ratio gap is rarely a paperwork issue, it's a structural one.
6. Research evidence quality, not quantity
Under GAPC v4.0, quality of research output is weighted over quantity. SCI/Scopus indexed publications and peer-reviewed venues count more than paid open-access journals. Faculty publishing volume without indexed venues may score lower than departments with fewer but higher-quality outputs.
How Edhitch helps institutions clear NBA
Three engagement modes depending on where you are in the cycle.
Engagement options
1. NBA Readiness Diagnostic
For institutions 6–18 months from submission. We audit your current state against the July 2024 SAR format and GAPC v4.0, identify gaps in faculty, infrastructure, processes, and data systems, and produce a written readiness report with prioritized actions. Typically 2–3 weeks. Anchored at ₹50,000 starting engagement.
2. NBA SAR Preparation & CO-PO Sprint (1-week)
For institutions with submission deadlines in 6–12 weeks. Our automation pipeline ingests your 3 years of academic data and produces NBA-compliant CO-PO attainment across all courses, with SAR Annexure-ready documentation and faculty training to defend the numbers in the peer team visit. See the 1-week sprint approach.
3. IntelliAccredit Platform
For institutions building long-term capability. Our software platform handles ongoing CO-PO computation, evidence collection, SAR drafting, and data integration across NBA, NAAC, and NIRF cycles. Platform overview.
Frequently asked questions
What is the latest NBA SAR format for Tier-I engineering programs?
The current NBA SAR for Tier-I Engineering programs is the July 2024 document, made applicable from 1 August 2024. From 1 January 2025 onwards, only the July 2024 SAR document is accepted for Tier-I Engineering programs. The January 2016 format is no longer accepted. The new format is aligned with GAPC Version 4.0, which itself reflects the Washington Accord 2021 review. The biggest change is the move from 12 Program Outcomes to 11 Program Outcomes, with Sustainability and Ethics integrated into Design, Investigation, and Analysis rather than as standalone POs.
Which NBA manual applies to my institution: Tier-I or Tier-II?
Tier-I applies to autonomous engineering institutions (granted autonomous status by UGC, where one batch of students has graduated under autonomy). Tier-II applies to affiliated engineering institutions (affiliated to a university which awards the degree). The fundamental difference: Tier-I institutions design their own curriculum and assessment; Tier-II institutions follow the affiliating university's curriculum. NBA evaluates Tier-I and Tier-II under separate manuals because the evidence requirements differ accordingly.
What is the NBA Pre-Qualifier and how does it work?
The NBA Pre-Qualifier is a screening stage introduced to filter applications before full SAR evaluation. Institutions pay 10 percent of the fee, fill the Pre-Qualifier format, and submit. NBA evaluates whether essential qualifiers (Student-Faculty Ratio, Faculty Cadre Ratio, Establishment compliance with AICTE records, etc.) are met. If compliant, the institution pays the remaining 90 percent fee and submits the full SAR. If non-compliant, the institution is informed of shortcomings and may re-apply after addressing them. This protects both NBA's evaluation bandwidth and the institution's investment of resources.
What changed in GAPC v4.0 compared to v3.0?
GAPC v4.0 reflects the Washington Accord 2021 review. Three changes matter most. First, the number of Program Outcomes reduced from 12 to 11, with Sustainability and Ethics merged into the broader competencies (Design, Investigation, Analysis) rather than being separately scored. Second, the framing of Complex Engineering Problems (WP) and Complex Engineering Activities (EA) was tightened, requiring more specific evidence in SAR documentation. Third, the assessment philosophy emphasizes data-driven Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) showing that previous 3 years of PO/PSO attainment data led to documented curriculum or pedagogy changes.
How does the new SAR format affect institutions that already submitted under the old format?
Tier-I engineering institutions that submitted under the January 2016 SAR format before 31 December 2024 had the option to continue with that format or re-apply under the July 2024 format. From 1 January 2025 onwards, only the July 2024 format is available. For Tier-II engineering institutions, the new format became effective in January 2025 with a transition window allowing the previous format until June 2025. Institutions with ongoing accreditation cycles should consult with NBA directly on transition handling for their specific case.
What is the SFR requirement for NBA Tier-I and Tier-II?
Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) is one of the most strictly evaluated pre-qualifier metrics. The NBA Tier-I UG Engineering Manual specifies adherence to a 20:1 (1:20) Student-Faculty Ratio, with calculations based on both student numbers and faculty requirements as per the SAR document. A separate First-Year SFR (FYSFR) of 1:20 applies for institutional first-year intakes above 720. Critically, NBA cross-checks the SFR claimed in SAR against AICTE-approved intake records and the institution's actual faculty headcount as on the cut-off date. Discrepancies between claimed faculty count and AICTE data are a common cause of pre-qualifier rejection. Faculty must be regular (or contractual faculty meeting AICTE prescribed qualifications, appointed full-time for at least two consecutive semesters) with required qualifications to be counted. Department heads, principals, deans, and other administrative posts with teaching/practical load can be counted; faculty without teaching or practical loads cannot.
Which NBA manuals exist for non-engineering programs?
NBA accredits programs beyond engineering, each with its own manual: PG Engineering, Diploma Engineering, Pharmacy (D.Pharm, B.Pharm, M.Pharm), Architecture, MCA, Management (MBA, PGDM), and Hotel Management. Each manual has program-specific evaluation criteria — for example, Management programs use a Three Gates framework (Faculty, Industry, Alumni) totaling 400 marks across Criteria C6, C7, and C9, which is structurally different from the Engineering CO-PO framework. Architecture uses studio-based assessment. Pharmacy aligns with PCI requirements. All current manuals are available on the official NBA portal at nbaind.org/Downloads/Documents/.
For all official NBA documents, visit the National Board of Accreditation. International framework reference: Washington Accord (international engineering accreditation benchmark). Higher education regulator: All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE).
Book Your Free 30-Min NBA Readiness Call
30 minutes. We review your current state against the July 2024 SAR format and GAPC v4.0, flag the most likely pre-qualifier risks, and tell you honestly where you stand. Scoped proposal within 24 hours if there's a fit.
Call Request Received!
We'll confirm a 30-minute slot within 24 hours.
For immediate help: WhatsApp +91-92051 19385