MARB — the Medical Assessment and Rating Board — is one of the four autonomous boards under the National Medical Commission (NMC), constituted under Section 26(b) of the NMC Act, 2019. MARB is responsible for granting permission to establish medical colleges (LOP/LOD), conducting inspections, and as of May 2025, developing a separate graded accreditation and rating framework for all medical colleges regulated by NMC.
In short: On 10 May 2025, MARB published a draft framework for accreditation and ranking of medical colleges, exercising powers under Section 26(1)(d) of the NMC Act 2019. The framework comprises 11 criteria, 78 evaluation parameters (26 qualitative + 52 quantitative), and 1000 total points. NMC sought stakeholder feedback through an online form within 21 days of publication. Assessment will be conducted through an independent third-party agency — an MoU with the Quality Council of India (QCI) was signed in July 2023. The framework remains under consultation; final implementation timeline has not been confirmed.
What MARB is, in plain terms
Until the NMC Act 2019, India had no graded accreditation framework for medical education. The Medical Council of India ran recognition inspections, but every accredited medical college was treated the same on paper — whether it had thriving research, robust clinical training, and strong outcomes, or just barely met minimum requirements. There was no equivalent of NAAC's grading or NIRF's ranking specifically calibrated to medical education.
MARB exists to change that. Per NMC Chairman Dr. BN Gangadhar, the new framework will be "the first time that medical colleges will be assessed based on the set parameters and rated" — introducing performance differentiation beyond binary "recognized vs not recognized."
MARB's six statutory functions
MARB's powers are defined in the NMC Act 2019. The full statutory functions, sourced verbatim from NMC's official MARB page:
- Determine the procedure for assessing and rating medical institutions for their compliance with standards laid down by UGMEB or PGMEB, in accordance with regulations made under the NMC Act.
- Grant permission for establishment of a new medical institution, or to start any postgraduate course, or to increase number of seats — in accordance with regulations made under the Act.
- Carry out inspections of medical institutions for assessing and rating such institutions — with the explicit power to hire and authorise third-party agencies or persons to carry out inspections. Where third-party inspection is conducted, the medical institution is obligated to provide access.
- Conduct, or empanel independent rating agencies to conduct, assess and rate all medical institutions, within such period of their opening, and every year thereafter, at such time and in such manner as specified in regulations.
- Make available on its website or in public domain the assessment and ratings of medical institutions at regular intervals, in accordance with regulations made under the Act.
- Take enforcement measures against institutions that fail to maintain minimum essential standards. This includes: issuing warnings, imposing monetary penalties, reducing intake, stoppage of admissions, and recommending to the Commission the withdrawal of recognition.
Function 6 is the lever that gives MARB real teeth. Beyond rating, MARB can stop your admissions, reduce your seats, or recommend withdrawal of your recognition. These are existential outcomes for a medical college.
From MCI inspections to MARB rating: the evolution
It helps to see MARB in its historical context. Indian medical education governance has evolved through several phases, each addressing the weaknesses of the previous:
The 11 criteria of the MARB draft framework
The criteria below are the verbatim 11 criteria from the May 2025 MARB draft framework, with verified parameter counts and weightages from public NMC communications. Where weightage is not yet publicly confirmed in the draft documents Edhitch has reviewed, it is marked accordingly — we do not invent numbers.
| # | Criterion | Qual. | Quant. | Total Params | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curriculum Implementation and Capacity Building Activities | 3 | 3 | 6 | 100 |
| 2 | Clinical Exposure, Clinical Training, Internship and Clinical Facilities | 1 | 10 | 11 | 100 |
| 3 | Teaching-Learning Environment: Physical, Psychological & Occupational | 11 | 0 | 11 | 130 |
| 4 | Students' Admission, Attainment of Competence & Progression | 2 | 4 | 6 | 140 |
| 5 | Human Resource & Teaching-Learning Process | 2 | 9 | 11 | 160 |
| 6 | Assessment Policy: Formative, Internal & Summative Assessment | — | — | — | Subject to final NMC publication |
| 7 | Research Output and Impact | — | — | — | Subject to final NMC publication |
| 8 | Financial Resource (recurring & non-recurring expenditures) | — | — | — | Subject to final NMC publication |
| 9 | Community Outreach Programs | 1 | 3 | 4 | 40 |
| 10 | Quality Assurance System | 2 | 3 | 5 | 30 |
| 11 | Feedback & Perception of Stakeholders | 0 | 4 | 4 | 40 (reduced from 80) |
| Total | 26 | 52 | 78 | 1000 | |
Weightages marked “verified” are confirmed from public NMC notifications and reputable Indian medical education press coverage of the May 2025 draft. Weightages marked “subject to final publication” require reference to NMC’s complete draft document or final notification.
What each criterion measures — the practitioner's read
Beyond the labels, here is what each criterion is actually evaluating, based on parameters disclosed in NMC’s draft framework:
- Curriculum Implementation — CBME integration depth, faculty development programmes (BCME, ACME), academic council functioning, curriculum committee outputs.
- Clinical Exposure — provision of real clinical material, OPD/IPD volumes, lab investigations, radiological services, with HMIS data verification.
- Teaching-Learning Environment — physical infrastructure, psychological safety, occupational support; an entirely qualitative criterion (11 qual + 0 quant) measured through interviews and observation.
- Students' Admission & Competence — NEET-based admissions, exit exam performance (FMGE/NExT), progression to PG and higher education. Stipend parameter was dropped from this criterion in the May 2025 draft.
- Human Resource & Teaching-Learning Process — the heaviest weighted criterion (160 points). Faculty qualifications under NMC Faculty Regulations 2025 (dated 30.06.2025), AEBAS attendance compliance, departmental review processes. The previous "share of full-time teachers" parameter was dropped.
- Assessment Policy — formative, internal, and summative assessment processes; the May 2025 draft adds department-wise analysis of student performance with corrective actions tracked.
- Research Output and Impact — indexed journal publications, citation impact, journal impact factor, funded projects, patents. Specific Q1-journal mandate dropped; replaced with differential scoring based on journal quality.
- Financial Resource — recurring vs non-recurring expenditure patterns, financial sustainability indicators.
- Community Outreach — rural health postings, public health engagement, community visits, vaccination drives.
- Quality Assurance System — internal QA cell functioning, continuous improvement loops, integration with NAAC IQAC if applicable.
- Feedback & Perception — student, faculty, patient, and community feedback collection and analysis; the weightage reduction (80 to 40) reflects NMC’s rebalancing toward objective parameters.
MARB vs NAAC vs NIRF Medical: who measures what
A medical college Dean asking "do I need MARB if I already have NAAC?" is asking the wrong question. MARB, NAAC, and NIRF Medical measure different things and serve different audiences. Most leading Indian medical colleges will need all three.
| MARB | NAAC | NIRF Medical | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Regulator-driven accreditation & rating | Voluntary quality assessment | Public ranking |
| Governing body | NMC, via MARB | Autonomous body under UGC | Ministry of Education (MoE) |
| Mandatory? | Compliance with NMC standards is mandatory; the rating itself, once rolled out, is binding on all NMC-regulated medical colleges | Voluntary in principle; effectively mandatory for serious institutions | Voluntary; participation is competitive |
| Framework basis | NMC Act 2019, Sec 26(1)(d) | UGC Act + NAAC Statute | NIRF Methodology Document |
| Cycle | To be determined; likely periodic | Binary + MBGL (post-Feb 2025); typically 3–5 years | Annual |
| Output | Rated band (to be finalized) | Accredited / Not Accredited + MBGL Level | Numerical rank within category |
| Enforcement teeth | Strong — can stop admissions, reduce seats, recommend withdrawal of recognition | Indirect — affects funding, autonomy, public reputation | Reputational only |
For a medical college, this means: NMC compliance and MARB rating are regulatory hygiene; NAAC accreditation is institutional quality positioning; NIRF Medical rank is public reputation and brand. All three draw from substantially the same underlying institutional data — faculty profiles, student outcomes, infrastructure, research output, financial data. Running them as three parallel projects is operationally expensive and creates data inconsistencies that hurt all three.
This is the integrated approach Edhitch takes with medical college clients including ASRAM: one institutional data architecture, framework-specific outputs on demand, and MARB-readiness mapping running alongside ongoing NAAC and NIRF cycles. See our NMC Accreditation overview →
MARB readiness for medical colleges: practical steps
Because the framework is still in consultation, the right MARB strategy today is readiness mapping, not formal pursuit. The colleges that move first — quietly building their evidence base while the framework finalizes — will be in a measurably stronger position when MARB rolls out the formal rating process.
Five readiness moves a medical college can make today, regardless of where MARB consultation lands:
- Map your current evidence to the 11 criteria. Most institutions already collect 60–70 percent of the underlying data for NMC compliance and NAAC SSR. Reorganize it against MARB’s 11 criteria to surface visible gaps now, while there is time to fix them.
- Audit CBME implementation, not just CBME documentation. The May 2025 draft increases emphasis on actual CBME integration — faculty development, skill stations, competency-based assessment. Surface-level CBME compliance will not survive MARB assessment.
- Verify your AEBAS and HMIS data. Faculty attendance and clinical material verification through Aadhaar Enabled Biometric Attendance System and Hospital MIS is increasingly central to MARB assessment. Inconsistencies between declared and verified data are an early flag.
- Strengthen Research Output evidence. Indexed publications, citation impact, funded projects — these are quantitative parameters where preparation must start years before assessment. Q1 publications no longer a strict mandate, but journal quality differential scoring remains.
- Integrate IQAC and Quality Assurance for MARB. Criterion 10 (Quality Assurance System) is where institutional quality processes live. Most medical colleges with an active IQAC for NAAC already have the foundation; the work is exposing that QA function to the MARB lens.
None of these moves is wasted effort even if the MARB framework changes. They strengthen NMC compliance, NAAC SSR, and NIRF Medical submissions simultaneously. The 60–70 percent overlap across frameworks is the leverage point.
Frequently asked questions
What is MARB?
MARB is the Medical Assessment and Rating Board, one of the four autonomous boards under the National Medical Commission (NMC). MARB was constituted under Section 26(b) of the NMC Act, 2019. Its functions include determining the procedure for assessing medical institutions, granting permission for new medical colleges and seat increases (the LOP/LOD process), conducting inspections directly or through empaneled third-party agencies, making assessment ratings publicly available, and taking enforcement action against non-compliant institutions including monetary penalty, intake reduction, stoppage of admissions, or recommendation for withdrawal of recognition.
What is the MARB draft framework released in May 2025?
On 10 May 2025, MARB released a draft framework for accreditation and ranking of all medical colleges regulated by NMC. The framework, exercising powers under Section 26(1)(d) of the NMC Act 2019, comprises 11 criteria and 78 evaluation parameters (26 qualitative + 52 quantitative) totaling 1000 points. NMC sought stakeholder comments through an online form within 21 days of publication. The framework will be implemented through an independent third-party agency — most likely the Quality Council of India (QCI), which signed an MoU with NMC in July 2023 for this purpose.
How is MARB different from existing NMC inspections?
Existing NMC inspections focus on minimum-standard compliance — checking whether a medical college meets UGMSR 2023 and PGMSR 2023 requirements to receive a Letter of Permission (LOP) or continuance of recognition. The new MARB accreditation framework introduces graded performance-based assessment beyond binary recognition, similar in concept to NAAC’s grading framework but tailored specifically to medical education. The Chairman of NMC has stated this will be the first time medical colleges are formally assessed against set parameters and rated.
What are the 11 criteria in the MARB framework?
The 11 MARB criteria are: (1) Curriculum Implementation and Capacity Building Activities; (2) Clinical Exposure, Clinical Training, Internship and Clinical Facilities; (3) Teaching-Learning Environment: Physical, Psychological and Occupational; (4) Students’ Admission, Attainment of Competence and Progression; (5) Human Resource and Teaching-Learning Process; (6) Assessment Policy: Formative, Internal and Summative Assessment; (7) Research Output and Impact; (8) Financial Resource (recurring and non-recurring expenditures); (9) Community Outreach Programs; (10) Quality Assurance System; (11) Feedback and Perception of Stakeholders.
What parameters were dropped from earlier MARB drafts?
Compared to the earlier 2023 draft prepared in partnership with QCI, the May 2025 version dropped several parameters including: stipends paid to interns and resident doctors; proportion of full-time or regular professors in the overall faculty; and the specific mention of publication in high-quartile (Q1) category journals under research output. Total parameter count reduced from 92 in the previous draft (20 qualitative + 72 quantitative) to 78 in the current draft (26 qualitative + 52 quantitative). A differential scoring system based on journal quality was introduced as part of another research criterion.
When will MARB ratings begin?
The framework remains in stakeholder consultation as of mid-2026. NMC has not officially confirmed a rollout date. Medical colleges should not pursue formal MARB ratings yet but should begin internal readiness on the 11 criteria so the gap is closed when the framework is finalized. Edhitch tracks MARB notifications on the NMC official portal and supports medical colleges with readiness mapping.
Does MARB replace NAAC for medical colleges?
No. MARB and NAAC are separate frameworks with overlapping but distinct purposes. MARB is the NMC’s statutory accreditation framework for medical education specifically. NAAC is the national framework for general higher education quality assessment, now operating under Binary Accreditation plus MBGL. Most Indian medical colleges hold both — and now must prepare for three: NMC compliance (UGMSR, PGMSR, MARB), NAAC accreditation, and NIRF Medical category ranking. Approximately 60–70 percent of the underlying institutional data overlaps across these frameworks, which is why integrated documentation outperforms parallel siloed projects.
What are MARB's enforcement powers?
Per the NMC Act 2019, MARB can take the following actions against medical institutions that fail to maintain minimum essential standards: (1) issue warnings, (2) impose monetary penalties, (3) reduce intake of seats, (4) stop admissions entirely, and (5) recommend to the National Medical Commission the withdrawal of recognition of the institution. These enforcement powers apply both to current LOP-based compliance and, prospectively, to the MARB accreditation and rating framework once finalized.
For MARB’s official updates, visit the Medical Assessment and Rating Board page on NMC. For NMC’s full regulations, see NMC Rules & Regulations.
Begin MARB Readiness Mapping for Your Medical College
Fill in your details. Our medical-vertical team will review your readiness against MARB’s 11 criteria and share next steps within 24 hours.
Enquiry Received!
Our medical-vertical team will respond within 24 hours.
For immediate help: WhatsApp +91-92051 19385