Binary NAAC Accreditation – How to Win the Yes/No Game

What is Binary NAAC Accreditation?

Binary NAAC Accreditation replaces narrative-heavy reviews with yes/no responses supported by verifiable documents. Every claim must have proof; verification is fully digital—no peer team visit—so precision and completeness are critical.

Why It’s Tougher Than It Looks

• No peer visit: no chance to clarify context on-site.
• Automated checks: strict validation for dates, links, and consistency.
• Zero tolerance for mismatch: numbers must align across AQAR/SSR/reports.
• Evidence-heavy: each “Yes” needs policy + implementation + outcome.

10-Step Plan to Win Binary NAAC Accreditation

1. Understand all 10 criteria and their sub-metrics.
2. Standardize file naming, dates, signatures, and formats (PDF/XLSX).
3. Centralize a criterion-wise evidence bank with access controls.
4. Ensure data consistency across AQAR, minutes, reports, and website.
5. Upload policy + implementation + outcome (triangulated evidence).
6. Use geo-tagged photos, timestamps, and active links where applicable.
7. Run pre-submission audits with checklists and cover notes.
8. Train coordinators and reviewers on Binary NAAC evidence quality.
9. Monitor readiness with a dashboard (green/amber/red by metric).
10. Lock final versions and maintain an audit trail for DVV.

How Edhitch’s AI Speeds Up Binary NAAC Accreditation

• Auto-validates evidence and flags missing or weak documents.
• Detects number mismatches across reports and submissions.
• Maps files to the right criterion/metric automatically.
• Generates submission-ready packs and DVV check reports.

📥 Request a Live Demo